Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Patients’, clinicians’ and the research communities’ priorities for treatment research: there is an important mismatch

  • Sally Crowe1Email author,
  • Mark Fenton2,
  • Matthew Hall3,
  • Katherine Cowan4 and
  • Iain Chalmers5
Research Involvement and Engagement20151:2

DOI: 10.1186/s40900-015-0003-x

Received: 22 January 2015

Accepted: 14 May 2015

Published: 25 June 2015

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Jan 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
14 May 2015 Editorially accepted
25 Jun 2015 Article published 10.1186/s40900-015-0003-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Crowe Associates Ltd.
(2)
UK DUETs, NHS Evidence, National Institute of Health and Social Care Excellence
(3)
Institute for Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh
(4)
Katherine Cowan Consulting Ltd.
(5)
James Lind Initiative

Advertisement