A framework for public involvement at the design stage of NHS health and social care research: time to develop ethically conscious standards
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 19 October 2016
Accepted: 30 March 2017
Published: 4 April 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|19 Oct 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|9 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roger Wilson|
|15 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bjorn Hoffman|
|20 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Janet Wale|
|21 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mark Smith|
|24 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jackie Street|
|26 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Raksha Pandya-Wood|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Raksha Pandya-Wood|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|14 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 Mar 2017||Editorially accepted|
|4 Apr 2017||Article published||10.1186/s40900-017-0058-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.