Skip to main content

Table 2 Analysis Framework

From: Reporting involvement activities with children and young people in paediatric research: a framework analysis

Item

Questions to support analysis

Aim*

(1) Did the authors describe the aim(s) of PPI in the study?

Methods

(2a) Is there a description of the methods used for involving CYP at different phases of the research process? This would include a description of:

 Level of involvement (e.g., consultation, collaboration, child-led)

 PPI population (e.g., numbers involved, age group, other demographics, and medical condition)

 Model of involvement (e.g., development of a Project Advisory Group, focus group, tapped into existing Young Person’s Advisory Group, etc.)

(2b) Is there a description of the level of involvement within the various phases of the research process? This would include a description of:

 What phase of the research process are CYP involved?

 Is this involvement at just one phase of the research process or multiple levels?

Study results (outcomes)*

(3) Is there a description of the outcomes of PPI with CYP? (both positive and negative)

Impact

(4) Is there a description of the impact of PPI with CYP? (both positive and negative). This could include any description of the following impact:

 Impact on the study

 Impact on CYP

 Impact on researchers

 Impact on policy

Dissemination

(5) Is there a description of how CYP supported (or will support) the dissemination of research findings/results?

Reflections/critical perspectives*

(6) Is there a description of the conclusions and lessons learned from PPI with CYP?

  1. *Only required when reporting against the GRIPP2SF