Table 1 Structure and outputs of the Task and Finish groups
Task and finish group | 1. Quality indicators | 2. Assessment framework | 3. Training framework | 4. Quality awards event |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Aims | Establishment of the overall programme structure and development of the quality indicators | Creation of the assessment framework | Development of an assessor training framework | Creation of the structure and assessment of the logistics of a quality awards event |
Topics | What is already available? | What is meant by an assessment? | What does the assessor role look like? | What does the structure of the awards event look like? |
Who is the target audience? | What evidence would be required? | What kind of documents might assessors need to evaluate? | How would the nomination process work? | |
What will the structure of the programme look like? | How would the evidence be collected? | What training would assessors need? How might this be delivered and by whom? | How would nominations be assessed and by whom? | |
What are the descriptors for the quality indicators? | What would the expectations be for each of the four quality levels? | What would an assessment panel look like and where would we recruit them from? | What are the logistical and financial considerations for the awards event? | |
Membership (professional:public contributors) | 8: 5 | 9: 7 | 5: 2 | 3: 5 |
Number of meetings | 6 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
Outputs | QI1. Quality Indicators | AF1. Process Map for Quality Recognition Scheme | TF1. Assessor role descriptors | QAE1. Process Map for Quality Awards Event |
QI2. Mind Map | AF2. Scheme Introduction Pack for Participating Organisations | TF2. Assessor Training Pack | TF2. Content of Training Pack regarding Quality Awards Event |