Open Peer Review Reports for: ‘Is it worth doing?’ Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement in research
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 May 2015 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Author responded | Author comments | |
| Reviewed | Reviewer Report | |
| Reviewed | Reviewer Report | |
| Reviewed | Reviewer Report | |
| Reviewed | Reviewer Report | |
| Reviewed | Reviewer Report | |
| Reviewed | Reviewer Report | |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 20 Jul 2015 | Editorially accepted | |
| 31 Jul 2015 | Article published | 10.1186/s40900-015-0008-5 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
