Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: It’s not evidence, it’s insight: bringing patients’ perspectives into health technology appraisal at NICE

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Oct 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Roger Wilson
2 Nov 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Janet Wale
4 Nov 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karen Facey
30 Nov 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sophie Söderholm Werkö
5 Jan 2016 Author responded Author comments - Kristina Staley
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Jan 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Jan 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karen Facey
31 Jan 2016 Author responded Author comments - Kristina Staley
Resubmission - Version 3
31 Jan 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
6 Feb 2016 Editorially accepted
24 Mar 2016 Article published 10.1186/s40900-016-0018-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement