It’s not evidence, it’s insight: bringing patients’ perspectives into health technology appraisal at NICE
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|8 Oct 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roger Wilson|
|2 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Janet Wale|
|4 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karen Facey|
|30 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sophie Söderholm Werkö|
|5 Jan 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Kristina Staley|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Jan 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karen Facey|
|31 Jan 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Kristina Staley|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|31 Jan 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Feb 2016||Editorially accepted|
|24 Mar 2016||Article published||10.1186/s40900-016-0018-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.