Patient-reported quality indicators for osteoarthritis: a patient and public generated self-report measure for primary care
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Aug 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 Oct 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Steven Blackburn|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Oct 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul Charlton|
|27 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Janet Wale|
|1 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alison Ford|
|10 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kristin Liabo|
|17 Jan 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Steven Blackburn|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Jan 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Feb 2016||Editorially accepted|
|17 Mar 2016||Article published||10.1186/s40900-016-0019-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.