Evaluating public involvement in research design and grant development: Using a qualitative document analysis method to analyse an award scheme for researchers
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|4 Dec 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jonathan Boote|
|5 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Doreen Tembo|
|21 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anne McKenzie|
|4 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gill Norman|
|9 Mar 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Susan Baxter|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|9 Mar 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Mar 2016||Editorially accepted|
|1 Apr 2016||Article published||10.1186/s40900-016-0027-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.