Prioritising target behaviours for research in diabetes: Using the nominal group technique to achieve consensus from key stakeholders
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Aug 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephanie Tierney|
|12 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jackie Sturt|
|22 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Janet Harris|
|26 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lynn Hampson|
|22 Dec 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Jennifer Mc Sharry|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Dec 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amanda Roberts|
|14 Mar 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Jennifer Mc Sharry|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|14 Mar 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Mar 2016||Editorially accepted|
|6 Apr 2016||Article published||10.1186/s40900-016-0028-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.