Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A patient and public involvement (PPI) toolkit for meaningful and flexible involvement in clinical trials – a work in progress

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Jul 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Jul 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Roger Steele
17 Aug 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Simon Denegri
25 Aug 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Claire Planner
1 Sep 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jack Nunn
30 Nov 2015 Author responded Author comments - Heather Bagley
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Nov 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sue Pavitt
14 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Philippa Yeeles
15 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Roger Wilson
16 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthew Baker
17 Mar 2016 Author responded Author comments - Heather Bagley
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Mar 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
23 Mar 2016 Editorially accepted
27 Apr 2016 Article published 10.1186/s40900-016-0029-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement