A patient and public involvement (PPI) toolkit for meaningful and flexible involvement in clinical trials – a work in progress
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|17 Jul 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|29 Jul 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roger Steele|
|17 Aug 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Simon Denegri|
|25 Aug 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Claire Planner|
|1 Sep 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jack Nunn|
|30 Nov 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Heather Bagley|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Nov 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sue Pavitt|
|14 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Philippa Yeeles|
|15 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roger Wilson|
|16 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthew Baker|
|17 Mar 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Heather Bagley|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Mar 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Mar 2016||Editorially accepted|
|27 Apr 2016||Article published||10.1186/s40900-016-0029-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.