Patients’ perspectives can be integrated in health technology assessments: an exploratory analysis of CADTH Common Drug Review
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|30 Oct 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|13 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kerstin Morrison|
|17 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shahid Muhammad|
|18 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karen Facey|
|7 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jo NANSON|
|6 Apr 2016||Author responded||Author comments|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Apr 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 May 2016||Editorially accepted|
|7 Jun 2016||Article published||10.1186/s40900-016-0036-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.