The consultation of rugby players in co-developing a player health study: feasibility and consequences of sports participants as research partners
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|1 Sep 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|29 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jack Nunn|
|10 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Helena Binder|
|9 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sophie Söderholm Werkö|
|17 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Madeleine A. M. Davies|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Mar 2017||Editorially accepted|
|4 May 2017||Article published||10.1186/s40900-017-0055-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.