Understanding Plain English summaries. A comparison of two approaches to improve the quality of Plain English summaries in research reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|16 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Helen Bulbeck|
|29 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Annabelle South|
|5 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rachel Jones|
|23 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rhianna Broadway|
|26 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dawn Lobban|
|29 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Emma Kirkpatrick|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 Jul 2017||Editorially accepted|
|9 Oct 2017||Article published||10.1186/s40900-017-0064-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.