Patient involvement in guidelines is poor five years after institute of medicine standards: review of guideline methodologies
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|20 Apr 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Janet Wale|
|15 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthew Baker|
|15 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Diego Villalón|
|23 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Liz Avital|
|26 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jane Cowl|
|20 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Victoria Thomas|
|3 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Melissa Armstrong|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|2 Oct 2017||Article published||10.1186/s40900-017-0070-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.