From: Public involvement could usefully inform ethical review, but rarely does: what are the implications?
• Clinicians talking to a few patients in their clinic |
• Presenting the proposal at an event or conference |
• Presentations to patient groups – either local groups or linked to a charity |
• Consulting standing public involvement panels within local trusts or universities, research networks, charities |
• Discussion with one named patient |
• Organising a meeting with patients (sometimes with National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Research Design Service funding) |
• Setting up an advisory group for the project for consultation at this stage and subsequently deciding to keep the group in place for the remainder of the project |
• Consulting a number of patient groups including project specific and professional groups |
• Consulting a steering committee or advisory group overseeing the project which had patient members as well as professionals |
• Developing the study within a Network Clinical Studies Group |
• Receiving input via patient members of the funders’ grant review committee |