Reporting and appraising the context, process and impact of PPI on contributors, researchers and the trial during a randomised controlled trial - the 3D study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|4 Dec 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Helen Bulbeck|
|29 Dec 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthew Baker|
|2 Jan 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mari James|
|9 Jan 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Delia Muir|
|4 Feb 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sue Pavitt|
|15 Mar 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Cindy Mann|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|15 Mar 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Mar 2018||Editorially accepted|
|14 May 2018||Article published||10.1186/s40900-018-0098-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.