Experience
|
Q1. Do you have any experience with reading/using/doing/participating in trials you might consider equity-relevant?
|
Prompt: Some experience? None? Interest in? Value of? Can you explain your role? When was this?]
|
Familiarity with checklist use
|
Q2. Would you explain your experience with CONSORT?
|
Prompt: Some experience? None? Interest in? Value of? Can you explain your role? When was this?
|
Feedback on the checklist.
[Make sure that the participant has a copy of the checklist in front of them]
|
Q3. a. Now I will review each section of the CONSORT checklist with you and will ask you about it, okay? For the section titled [title/abstract et cetera – each section of the checklist], is it important that the information on how equity is relevant for the trial is reported for the [title/abstract et cetera]?
[This process will be repeated with each section of CONSORT checklist – there are six sections: title/abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, other information. There are subsections for each section and it is expected that participants will refer to subsections and issues of particular importance, if needed].
|
Why?
Are there any reasons that it might be challenging to include information on how equity is relevant for a trial in this section?
[For each section of the CONSORT checklist]
|
Perceived use of checklist
|
Q4. Would you use the CONSORT checklist if it was modified to include equity-relevant considerations?
|
Why or why not?
|
Perceived relevance of checklist
|
Q5. Would you encourage others to use the CONSORT checklist if it was modified to include equity-relevant considerations?
|
Why or why not?
|
Additional comments
|
Q6. Any other comments or suggestions to make the checklist better for reporting equity-relevant trials?
|
-
|