Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Involving service users in the qualitative analysis of patient narratives to support healthcare quality improvement

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
31 Jul 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catherine Jenkins
19 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adele Horobin
25 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan Hrisos
28 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephanie Howard Wilsher
29 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Laureline Gatellier
27 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Louise Locock
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adele Horobin
19 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephanie Howard Wilsher
26 Nov 2018 Author responded Author comments - Louise Locock
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Nov 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
29 Nov 2018 Editorially accepted
3 Jan 2019 Article published 10.1186/s40900-018-0133-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement