Involving service users in the qualitative analysis of patient narratives to support healthcare quality improvement
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|31 Jul 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Aug 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Catherine Jenkins|
|19 Aug 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Adele Horobin|
|25 Aug 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Susan Hrisos|
|28 Aug 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephanie Howard Wilsher|
|29 Aug 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Laureline Gatellier|
|27 Oct 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Louise Locock|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 Oct 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Nov 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Adele Horobin|
|19 Nov 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephanie Howard Wilsher|
|26 Nov 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Louise Locock|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Nov 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Nov 2018||Editorially accepted|
|3 Jan 2019||Article published||10.1186/s40900-018-0133-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.