A lung cancer research agenda that reflects the diverse perspectives of community stakeholders: process and outcomes of the SEED method
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|9 Aug 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 Sep 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Carlin Rafie|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|11 Sep 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|6 Oct 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rachel Matthews|
|13 Oct 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Osborne|
|16 Oct 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthew Baker|
|27 Nov 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Carlin Rafie|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Nov 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Nov 2018||Editorially accepted|
|11 Jan 2019||Article published||10.1186/s40900-018-0134-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.