‘What can I do that will most help researchers?’ A different approach to training the public at the start of their involvement in research
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|25 Sep 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Oct 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alan Brown|
|17 Oct 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - William Stubley|
|24 Oct 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul Leighton|
|2 Nov 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Janet Jull|
|19 Dec 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Kristina Staley|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|19 Dec 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Feb 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Kristina Staley|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Feb 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Feb 2019||Editorially accepted|
|20 Feb 2019||Article published||10.1186/s40900-019-0144-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.