Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Learning as an outcome of involvement in research: what are the implications for practice, reporting and evaluation?

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Oct 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Roger Wilson
14 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Parnell
17 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hazel Thornton
21 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Patricia Wilson
26 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Theresa Bengough
21 Nov 2018 Author responded Author comments - Kristina Staley
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Nov 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hazel Thornton
7 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Parnell
10 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Theresa Bengough
19 Dec 2018 Author responded Author comments - Kristina Staley
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Dec 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Feb 2019 Author responded Author comments - Kristina Staley
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Feb 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
22 Feb 2019 Editorially accepted
12 Mar 2019 Article published 10.1186/s40900-019-0147-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement