Adapting the James Lind Alliance priority setting process to better support patient participation: an example from cystic fibrosis
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 Apr 2019||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Apr 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Noel McCarthy|
|29 Apr 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patrick Miqueu|
|18 Jun 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Nicola Jane Rowbotham|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Jun 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Aug 2019||Editorially accepted|
|20 Aug 2019||Article published||10.1186/s40900-019-0159-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.