Skip to main content

Table 3 Priority setting workshop evaluation results

From: Citizen and stakeholder led priority setting for long-term care research: identifying research priorities within the Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) Program

 

Mean Responsea

I was clear on the purpose of today’s Priority Setting Workshop

4.7

The ranking sheet (that you received via email) was clear and understandable)

4.4

The presentation of how the questions were developed was valuable

4.5

There was sufficient time allotted for the small group ranking

4.3

The discussion in the small group was valuable

4.7

I felt comfortable in the small group discussions

4.9

I felt comfortable in the large group discussion

4.9

The length of the workshop (i.e., 10 am to 3 pm) was appropriate

4.5

I felt my voice was heard through the discussions

4.8

I feel that this was a valuable use of my time

4.7

  1. aPossible scores ranging from 1 to 5, with 5 meaning ‘strongly agree’