Skip to main content

Table 3 Priority setting workshop evaluation results

From: Citizen and stakeholder led priority setting for long-term care research: identifying research priorities within the Translating Research in Elder Care (TREC) Program

 Mean Responsea
I was clear on the purpose of today’s Priority Setting Workshop4.7
The ranking sheet (that you received via email) was clear and understandable)4.4
The presentation of how the questions were developed was valuable4.5
There was sufficient time allotted for the small group ranking4.3
The discussion in the small group was valuable4.7
I felt comfortable in the small group discussions4.9
I felt comfortable in the large group discussion4.9
The length of the workshop (i.e., 10 am to 3 pm) was appropriate4.5
I felt my voice was heard through the discussions4.8
I feel that this was a valuable use of my time4.7
  1. aPossible scores ranging from 1 to 5, with 5 meaning ‘strongly agree’