Skip to main content

Table 4 Categories and sub-categories of participants’ experiences of the co-creative collaboration

From: What makes it work? Exploring experiences of patient research partners and researchers involved in a long-term co-creative research collaboration

Category

Sub-category

Reasons for investing in a long-term collaboration

Negative experiences of information and care

Desire to improve cancer care

Engaging topics

Chance to get answers to own questions

The form for the collaboration attracted interest

Benefits of participating

Participation as a kind of therapy

An educational and fun activity

My work feels relevant and meaningful

Improving the research

Contributes to making the research project relevant, acceptable and tailored

A more thought-through research process

Indicates quality of the project

Elements of success

Engaged and committed participants

Strive towards a common goal

Clear yet accommodating structure

Open and trustworthy atmosphere

Input made a difference

A diverse group

Nice and fun to meet

Good leadership

Challenges and ways to improve

Greater diversity of group members

Alternative structure of collaboration to advance progress

Distance to meeting venue as an obstacle