TY - STD TI - Brighton LJ, Pask S, Benalia H, Bailey S, Sumerfield M, Witt J, de Wolf-Linder S, et al. Taking patient and public involvement online: qualitative evaluation of an online forum for palliative care and rehabilitation research. Res Involvement Engagement. 2018;4(1):14. ID - ref1 ER - TY - STD TI - Simpson A, Jones J, Barlow S, Cox L, SUGAR. Adding SUGAR: Service User and Carer Collaboration in Mental Health Nursing Research. J Psychosoc Nurs. 2014;52(1):22–30. ID - ref2 ER - TY - STD TI - Howe A, Delaney S, Romero J, Tinsley A, Vicary P. Ensuring public and patient participation in research: a case study in infrastructure development in one UK Research and Development consortium. Prim Health Care Res Develop. 2006;7(1):60–7. ID - ref3 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Fredriksson, M. AU - Tritter, J. Q. PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - Disentangling patient and public involvement in healthcare decisions: why the difference matters JO - Sociol Health Illn VL - 39 UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12483 DO - 10.1111/1467-9566.12483 ID - Fredriksson2017 ER - TY - STD TI - Crowe S,  Lodemore M, Wray P.  NIHR public involvement leads National Meeting Report 2017. 2017. http://www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/NIHR-Public-Involvement-Leads-National-Meeting-Report-2017.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2020. UR - http://www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/NIHR-Public-Involvement-Leads-National-Meeting-Report-2017.pdf ID - ref5 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Williams, P. PY - 2002 DA - 2002// TI - The competent boundary spanner JO - Public Admin VL - 80 UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00296 DO - 10.1111/1467-9299.00296 ID - Williams2002 ER - TY - STD TI - Wilson P, Mathie E, Keenan J, McNeilly E, Goodman C, Howe A, Poland F, et al. ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation the RAPPORT study. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2015;3(38):1–176. ID - ref7 ER - TY - STD TI - Mathie E, Wythe H, Munday D, Millac P, Rhodes G, Roberts N, Smeeton N, et al. Reciprocal relationships and the importance of feedback in patient and public involvement: a mixed methods study. Health Expect. 2018;21(5):889–908. ID - ref8 ER - TY - STD TI - NIHR. NIHR Public Contributors’ Feedback Survey: Results from a national survey of people's experience of being involved in NIHR work 2019; Available from: https://www.slideshare.net/SDenegri/nihr-public-contributors-feedback-report-april-2019. Accessed 12 Feb 2020. UR - https://www.slideshare.net/SDenegri/nihr-public-contributors-feedback-report-april-2019 ID - ref9 ER - TY - STD TI - Nasser M, Clarke M, Chalmers I, Gundro Bruberg K, Nykvist H, Lund H, Glasziou P.  What are funders doing to minimise waste in research? Lancet. 2017;389(10073):1006–7. ID - ref10 ER - TY - STD TI - Department of Health. Best research for best health. 2006. London: Department of Health. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/best-research-for-best-health-a-new-national-health-research-strategy. UR - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/best-research-for-best-health-a-new-national-health-research-strategy ID - ref11 ER - TY - BOOK PY - 2012 DA - 2012// TI - Briefing notes for researchers: involving the public in NHS, public health and social care research PB - INVOLVE CY - Southampton ID - ref12 ER - TY - BOOK PY - 2019 DA - 2019// TI - UK Standards for Public Involvement (website) ID - ref13 ER - TY - STD TI - CEPPP. Patient and Public Engagement Evaluation Toolkit. Available from: https://ceppp.ca/en/collaborations/evaluation-toolkit/. Accessed 6 Nov 2019. UR - https://ceppp.ca/en/collaborations/evaluation-toolkit/ ID - ref14 ER - TY - STD TI - Greenhalgh T, Hinton L, Finlay T, Macfarlane A, Fahy N, Clyde B, Chant A. Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: systematic review and co-design pilot. Health Expect. 2019;22(4):785–801. ID - ref15 ER - TY - STD TI - Staniszewska S, Seers K, Altman DG, Denegri S, Littlejohns P, Thomas V. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMJ. 2017;358. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j3453. ID - ref16 ER - TY - STD TI - Price A, Schroter S, Snow R, Hicks M, Harmston R, Staniszewska S, Parker S, Richards T. Frequency of reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research studies published in a general medical journal: a descriptive study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(3):e020452. ID - ref17 ER - TY - BOOK AU - Pawson, R. AU - Tilley, N. PY - 2001 DA - 2001// TI - Realistic Evaluation PB - Sage Publications CY - London ID - Pawson2001 ER - TY - STD TI - Staniszewska S, Adebajo A, Barber R, Beresford P, Brady LM, Brett J, Elliot J, et al. Developing the evidence base of patient and public involvement in health and social care research: the case for measuring impact. Int J Consum Stud. 2011;35(6):628–32. ID - ref19 ER - TY - STD TI - Staley, K., ‘Is it worth doing?’ Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement in research. Res Involvement Engagement. 2015;1(6). ID - ref20 ER - TY - STD TI - Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, Herron-Marx S, Hughes J, Tysall C, Suleman R.  A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities. Patient. 2014;7(4):387–95. ID - ref21 ER - TY - BOOK AU - Morgan, N. AU - Grinsbergs-Saull, A. AU - Murray, M. PY - 2018 DA - 2018// TI - ‘We can make our research meaningful. The impact of the Alzheimer’s Society Research Network PB - Alzheimer's Society CY - London ID - Morgan2018 ER - TY - STD TI - Mathie E, Wythe H, Munday D, Rhodes G, Vicary P, Millac P, Jones J.  Regional working in the East of England: using the UK National Standards for public involvement. Res Involvement Engagement. 2018;4:48. ID - ref23 ER - TY - STD TI - Mathie E, Wythe H, Munday D, Rhodes G, Vicary P, Millac P, Jones, J. et al. Guidance for Researchers: Feedback. Hatfield: CRIPACC, University of Hertfordshire; 2018. p. 15. http://www.clahrc-eoe.nihr.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Guidance-for-Researchers-PPI-Feedback_2018.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2020. UR - http://www.clahrc-eoe.nihr.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Guidance-for-Researchers-PPI-Feedback_2018.pdf ID - ref24 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Zhang, W. AU - Creswell, J. PY - 2013 DA - 2013// TI - The use of “mixing” procedure of mixed methods in health services research JO - Med Care VL - 51 UR - https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e31824642fd DO - 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31824642fd ID - Zhang2013 ER - TY - STD TI - Australian Clinical Trials Alliance. Consumer involvement and engagement toolkit. 2019. https://involvementtoolkit.clinicaltrialsalliance.org.au/toolkit/undertaking/providing-feedback-to-consumers/. Accessed 11 May 2020. UR - https://involvementtoolkit.clinicaltrialsalliance.org.au/toolkit/undertaking/providing-feedback-to-consumers/ ID - ref26 ER - TY - STD TI - NIHR.  PPI (patient and public involvement) resources for applicants to NIHR research programmes. 2019. https://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/ppi-patient-and-public-involvement-resources-for-applicants-to-nihr-research-programmes/23437. Accessed 11 May 2020. UR - https://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/ppi-patient-and-public-involvement-resources-for-applicants-to-nihr-research-programmes/23437 ID - ref27 ER - TY - STD TI - Evans D, Coad J, Cottrell K, Kalrymple J, Davies R, Donald C, Laterza V. et al. Public involvement in research: assessing impact through a realist evaluation. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2014;2(36):1–127. ID - ref28 ER - TY - BOOK PY - 2014 DA - 2014// TI - Report of public involvement Leads’ meeting ID - ref29 ER - TY - BOOK AU - Oakley, A. PY - 1974 DA - 1974// TI - The sociology of housework PB - Vintage Books CY - New York ID - Oakley1974 ER - TY - BOOK AU - Barnes, M. PY - 2006 DA - 2006// TI - Caring and social justice PB - Palgrave Macmillan CY - Hampshire UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-05193-6 DO - 10.1007/978-1-137-05193-6 ID - Barnes2006 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Evans, S. AU - Scarborough, H. PY - 2014 DA - 2014// TI - Supporting knowledge translation through collaborative translational research iniatitives: ‘bridging’ versus ‘blurring’ boundary-spanning appoarches in the UK CLAHRC iniative JO - Soc Sci Med VL - 106 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.025 DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.025 ID - Evans2014 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Carless, D. PY - 2019 DA - 2019// TI - Feedback loops and the longer-term: towards feedback spirals JO - Assess Eval High Educ VL - 44 UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1531108 DO - 10.1080/02602938.2018.1531108 ID - Carless2019 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Staley, K. AU - Barron, D. PY - 2019 DA - 2019// TI - Learning as an outcome of involvement in research: what are the implications for practice, reporting and evaluation? JO - Res Involvement Engagement VL - 5 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-019-0147-1 DO - 10.1186/s40900-019-0147-1 ID - Staley2019 ER - TY - STD TI - Jordan M, Rowley E, Morriss R, Manning N.  An analysis of the research team–service user relationship from the service user perspective: a consideration of ‘the three Rs’ (roles, relations, and responsibilities) for healthcare research organisations. Health Expect. 2015;18(6):2693–703. ID - ref35 ER - TY - STD TI - Hewlett S, de Wit M, Richards P, Quest E, Hughes R, Heiberg T, Kirwan J.  Patients and professionals as research partners: challenges, practicalities, and benefits. Arthritis Care Res. 2006;55(4):676–80. ID - ref36 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Gibson, A. AU - Britten, N. AU - Lynch, J. PY - 2012 DA - 2012// TI - Theoretical directions for an emancipatory concept of patient and public involvement JO - Health VL - 16 UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459312438563 DO - 10.1177/1363459312438563 ID - Gibson2012 ER - TY - STD TI - NIHR. Going the Extra Mile: Improving the Nation’s Health and Wellbeing Through Public Involvement in Research: NIHR; 2015. https://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/about-us/our-contribution-to-research/how-we-involve-patients-carers-and-the-public/Going-the-Extra-Mile.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2020. UR - https://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/about-us/our-contribution-to-research/how-we-involve-patients-carers-and-the-public/Going-the-Extra-Mile.pdf ID - ref38 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Madden, M. AU - Speed, E. PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - Beware zombies and unicorns: toward critical patient and public involvement in Health Research in a neoliberal context JO - Front Sociol VL - 2 ID - Madden2017 ER - TY - STD TI - Boylan AM, Locock L, Thompson R, Staniszewska S,  “About sixty per cent I want to do it”: health researchers’ attitudes to, and experiences of, patient and public involvement (PPI)—a qualitative interview study. Health Expect. 2019;22(4):721–30. ID - ref40 ER - TY - BOOK AU - Denegri, S. PY - 2018 DA - 2018// TI - Hey, prof! We need to talk about feedback. It’s not about closing the loop but learning together ID - Denegri2018 ER - TY - BOOK PY - 2019 DA - 2019// TI - (Health Research Authority) New best practice principles for public involvement ID - ref42 ER - TY - STD TI - Elliott J, Lodemore M, Minogue V, Wellings A. Public co-applicants in research - guidance on roles and responsibilities. 2019; Available from: https://www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Co-AppsGuidance2019.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2020. UR - https://www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Co-AppsGuidance2019.pdf ID - ref43 ER - TY - STD TI - Liabo K, Boddy K, Bortoli S, Irvine J, Boult H, Fredlund M, Joseph N, et al.  Public involvement in health research: what does ‘good’ look like in practice? Res Involvement Engagement. 2020;6:11. ID - ref44 ER - TY - STD TI - Boivin A, Richards T, Forsythe L, Grégoire A, L'Espérance A, Abelson J, Carman K.L. Evaluating patient and public involvement in research.  BMJ Editorials. 2018;363:k5147. https://www.bmj.com/content/363/bmj.k5147. UR - https://www.bmj.com/content/363/bmj.k5147 ID - ref45 ER -