Q1. What kind of impact has PRP involvement had on EuroTEAM overall? | |||||||
 | Extremely negative impact | Negative impact | Slightly negative impact | No impact | Slightly positive impact | Positive impact | Extremely positive impact |
Number (%) of PRPs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 (100%) | 0 |
Q2. How much do you feel you have been able to contribute positively to WPs 1–3? (WP1 genetics, WP2 blood, WP3 tissue) | |||||||
 | No contribution at all | Minor contribution | Moderate contribution | Large contribution | Extremely large contribution |  |  |
Number (%) of PRPs | 0 | 3 (50%) | 2 (33%) | 1 (17%) | 0 | Â | Â |
Q3. How much do you feel you have been able to contribute positively to WP4 (dissemination & user integration)? | |||||||
 | No contribution at all | Minor contribution | Moderate contribution | Large contribution | Extremely large contribution |  |  |
Number (%) of PRPs | 0 | 0 | 3 (50%) | 3 (50%) | 0 | Â | Â |
Q4. How well did you feel you understood the objectives, methods and outcomes of EuroTEAM? | |||||||
 | Did not understand at all | Understood a little | Moderate understanding | Understood a lot | Understood everything |  |  |
Number (%) of PRPs | 0 | 0 | 5 (83%) | 1 (17%) | 0 | Â | Â |
Q5. How did you feel about the number of assignments for PRPs in EuroTEAM? | |||||||
 | Far too few assignments | Too few assignments | About the right number of assignments | Too many assignments | Far too many assignments |  |  |
Number (%) of PRPs | 0 | 3 (50%) | 3 (50%) | 0 | 0 | Â | Â |
Q6. How did you feel about the level of difficulty of the assignments for PRPs in EuroTEAM? | |||||||
 | Far too difficult | Too difficult | About the right level of difficulty | Too easy | Far too easy |  |  |
Number (%) of PRPs | 0 | 0 | 6 (100%) | 0 | 0 | Â | Â |
Q7. How did you feel about the amount of information you received about assignments for PRPs in EuroTEAM? | |||||||
 | Far too little information | Too little information | About the right amount of information | Too much information | Far too much information |  |  |
Number (%) of PRPs | 0 | 0 | 6 (100%) | 0 | 0 | Â | Â |
Q8. How useful did you find the glossary for PRPs? | |||||||
 | Not at all useful | Not very useful | Moderately useful | Very useful | Extremely useful |  |  |
Number (%) of PRPs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 (83%) | 1 (17%) | Â | Â |
Q9. How welcome did you feel your opinions were? | |||||||
 | Not at all welcome | Not very welcome | Moderately welcome | Very welcome | Extremely welcome |  |  |
Number (%) of PRPs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 (67%) | 2 (33%) | Â | Â |
Q10. How well was PRP involvement co-ordinated? | |||||||
 | Not at all well- coordinated | Not very well- coordinated | Moderately well-coordinated | Very well- coordinated | Extremely well-coordinated |  |  |
Number (%) of PRPs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (17%) | 5 (83%) | Â | Â |
Q11. How did you feel about the amount of feedback you received on the outcome of your contribution to assignments for PRPs? | |||||||
 | Far too little feedback | Too little feedback | About the right amount of feedback | Too much feedback | Far too much feedback |  |  |
Number (%) of PRPs | 1 (17%) | 2 (33%) | 3 (50%) | 0 | 0 | Â | Â |
Q12. How did you feel about how fairly your contributions to the EuroTEAM project have been acknowledged? | |||||||
 | Not at all fairly | Not very fairly | Moderately fairly | Very fairly | Extremely fairly |  |  |
Number (%) of PRPs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 (50%) | 3 (50%) | Â | Â |
Q13. How well did you feel your contribution to EuroTEAM meetings was supported? | |||||||
 | Not at all well supported | Not very well supported | Moderately well supported | Very well supported | Extremely well supported |  |  |
Number (%) of PRPs | 0 | 0 | 1 (17%) | 2 (33%) | 3 (50%) | Â | Â |
Q14. How interested are you in contributing to future research projects as a PRP? | |||||||
 | Not at all interested | Not very interested | Moderately interested | Very interested | Extremely interested |  |  |
Number (%) of PRPs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (33%) | 4 (67%) | Â | Â |