Section | Description and purpose/rationale |
---|---|
STEP 1: Preparation for partnership and collaboration with patients | Focus is on engaging patients, establishing relationships, understanding patients’ views on participating, and defining the expectations of all parties Prepares stakeholders for participation in the program by: ● Educating patients on COA instruments and strategy (to the required level depending on anticipated input) ● Educating the study team on the importance of patient input in the development of a COA strategy ● Preparing the study team for a meaningful, effective, and respectful interaction with patients and giving them tools to build a mutually beneficial relationship ● Establishing the foundation for a long-term, collaborative patient–sponsor relationship |
STEP 2: Identification of relevant concepts (i.e., the burden of disease) | Starting point of any COA strategy ● Gaining a clear understanding from the patient (and/or carer) of their experience with the disease (and its treatment) and its impact on their life and well-being ● Identification and understanding of the signs, symptoms, and treatment burden patients experience and how these affect patients’ day-to-day functioning and quality of life to inform the COA strategy and ensure that the selected COA instrument(s) include(s) concepts that are relevant and important to patients |
STEP 3: COA selection | Undertaken after identifying concepts that are clinically relevant, important for patients, and likely to be affected by the drug Describes how to secure patient input and collaboration to: ● Review existing COAs to determine which measure(s) provides the best insight(s) into the key domains of interest ● Determine the relevance of the measure(s) for use within a clinical trial ● Assess if the measure(s) is/are appropriate for its intended use and context of use (e.g., measurement properties, targeted study design and objectives, and targeted patient population) |
STEP 4: COA development/revisions | Undertaken if the evaluation done under Steps 2 and 3 reveals that no existing measure meets the selection criteria that are relevant to the target population and context of use ● Describes how to secure patient input and collaboration to develop new COA tools or modify existing ones in accordance with available guidelines to meet regulatory requirements |
STEP 5: COA implementation within clinical trials | Patients’ roles in reviewing the trial protocol and advising on elements, including (but not limited to) ● COA end points ● Feasibility for trial participants to complete the COA as described in the protocol ● Information provided to the trial participants with regard to the rationale for completing the COA instrument and how/when these data will be used |
STEP 6: COA data interpretation | Collecting patient insights to provide a valuable perspective on what constitutes clinically meaningful change for COAs ● Conduct qualitative studies (e.g., in-trial exit interviews), surveys, or stakeholder meetings to discuss clinically meaningful change ● Patient experts involved in the study may provide input and facilitate communication with stakeholders to support the interpretation and importance of patient-relevant end points |
STEP 7: COA communication | Communicating COA data to augment limited product labeling and potentially hard to access scientific communication ● Incorporating PE to improve the clarity and meaningfulness of communications around COA data by providing input (e.g., development, review, approval) on the information that will be disclosed before its publication |