Table 1 Data extraction and quality assessment of included Research Priority Sets
Paper in date order | Population / focus of research | Methods used | Participants in the process? | Priorities and/or research questions | Stated a strategy, action plans for priorities? | Prioritisation focus included research methodology action or innovation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Perales, Reeves et al. 2020 Australia | Family lives – of Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual People | Literature review | Co-authors only | 10 | No | Yes |
McDaid, Flowers et al. 2020 Canada/UK | Gay, bisexual and other MSM/Sexual health literacy. | Consensus building workshop and secondary analysis of two focus group studies | Researchers, service providers, policy makers & knowledge users (38) in HIV prevention, sexual health and health literacy. | 15 | No | Yes |
Follmer, Sabat et al. 2020 USA | Disclosure of stigmatising identities in the workplace | Literature review Articles written in English | Co-authors only | 4 | No | Yes |
Clark, Capriotti et al. 2020 USA | Mental health professionals / supporting sexual and gender minority health | Web survey | Mental health professionals (163) | 7 | No | Yes |
LGBT Health 2020 USA | Sexual and Gender Minority Youth | None stated | Journal editors | 13 | Yes | No |
LGBT Health 2020 USA | Sexual and Gender Minority Health Research | None Stated | Journal editors | 14 | Yes | No |
Westwood 2019 UK | Older LGBT people | Scoping study / literature review and workshop | Co-authors only | 5 | No | Yes |
Westwood 2019 UK | Older LGBT people/abuse | Interviews for commentary and research agenda development | Women (36), Men (24) agedbetween 52–92. Narratives from 17 participants who mentioned abuse. | 5 | No | Yes |
Poteat 2019 International | Trans communities | Research presentation | Unknown | 3 | No | Yes |
Newcomb, LaSala et al. 2019 USA | LGBTQ youth health and family influence | Public symposium, expert consultation and working and writing groups | People from academia, federal health agencies, youth serving organizations, advocacy organizations, foundations, (family experience) and youth (40) | 27 in 6 themes | No | Yes |
Johns, Poteat et al. 2019 USA | LGBTQ youth health and influence of schools | Public symposium, expert consultation and working groups | People from academia, federal health agencies, youth serving organizations, advocacy organizations, foundations (school experience) and youth (40) | 36 in 9 themes | No | Yes |
Diamond 2017 USA | Lesbians/ Relationships | Personal commentary | Author | 3 | No | Yes |
Olson-Kennedy, Cohen-Kettenis et al. 2016 USA | Gender nonconforming and transgender youth | Review and report of working group (TransNet) | Endocrinologists and other medical professionals experienced in the care of transgender individuals. | 10 | No | No |
Safer, Coleman, Hembree 2016 USA | Transgender health and medicine | Account of creation of TransNet group | Endocrine Society research priority group, paediatric endocrinology expert in transgender medical researchers. | 5 | Yes | No |
Feldman, Brown et al. 2016 USA | Transgender/ Medical outcomes research | Review of research to date | Co-authors (reviewing 68 published research papers) | 18 research questions in 5 themes 20 priorities in 3 themes | No | Yes |
Papers retrieved and assessed after the workshop | ||||||
Marshall et al 2019 Canada | Transgender, Non-Binary and Gender Diverse | Literature review and evidence map All types of research explored. | Co Authors | 37 Study Topics with a ‘Top Ten’ and ‘Bottom Ten’ | No | Yes |
Nagington, Dickinson et al. 2017 UK | Older LGBT people | Symposium, survey and agreement analysis | Survey; 258 participants Symposium; 73 people: 41 from academic institutions (inc. 7 students), 23 from third sector organisationsfrom health and social care, 4 ‘other’ | 60 research questions in different priority order groups | No | No |
MacCarthy et al 2015 USA | Adult transgender health | Literature search of quantitative studies and gap analysis 1981–2013 | Co-authors reviewing 647 published and peer reviewed abstracts in English | 6 research gaps | No | Yes |