SPOR framework dimension | Theme | Issues/Gaps | Recommendations |
---|---|---|---|
Roles: patient as an inclusive term | Shifting roles: from patient to community researcher | Use of term patient implies passivity and lack of power Sets up an ‘us’ and ‘them’ dynamic Family as co-researchers lost in the framework | Shift away from use of term patient partner or researcher Use of the term community researcher Thread through families |
Benefits for individual in terms of skills and knowledge | From individual to community benefits | Lack of recognition of community benefits | Use of CBPR Feeling like part of a Community (countering isolation) Feeling heard and benefits of research for a better future |
SPOR principles: inclusiveness, support, mutual respect, and co-building solutions | Trust and equitable relationships as key principles | Lack of recognition of trust as key principle Lack of recognition of power inequities | Recognition of substance use related stigma and trust building Recognition of power inequities by all team members Ensure equitable pay Creation of a core research team with people with lived/living expertise |
Engagement in governance and decision making, capacity building for patient engagement, and tools and resources | From patients to drivers and co-learning | Patients as ‘other’ rather than driving research Lack of recognition that researchers not just patients need capacity building | Use of CBPR Core Research Team Two way and co-learning |
Missing SPOR component | From safety to action in POR | Missing emphasis on actioning the findings | Use of CBPR Accountability for action Catalytic validity |