Skip to main content

Table 3 Participants' feedback via chat on their chance to speak and usability of the digital format

From: Digital participatory workshops with patients and health professionals to develop an intervention for the management of polypharmacy: results from a mixed-methods evaluation and methodological conclusions

 

Patient group

Health care professional group

All participants

Chance to speak (median [min; max], n, valid n)

   

 IWS1

1 [1; 2], n = 7, valid n = 6

n.a

1 [1; 2], n = 7, valid n = 6

 IWS2

n.a

1 [1; 1], n = 9, valid n = 9

1 [1; 1], n = 9, valid n = 9

 IWS3

1 [1; 1], n = 4, valid n = 4

1 [1; 1], n = 6, valid n = 6

1 [1; 1], n = 10, vaid n = 10

 IWS4

n.a

1 [1; 3], n = 12; valid n = 11

1 [1; 3], n = 12; valid n = 11

 IWS5

n.a

1 [1; 1], n = 9; valid n = 7

1 [1; 1], n = 9; valid n = 7

 SWS1

1 [1; 1], n = 3; valid n = 2

1 [1; 2], n = 10; valid n = 6

1 [1; 2], n = 13; valid n = 8

 SWS2

Group assignment missing

1 [1; 5], n = 13; valid n = 7

 

 Overall

1 [1; 2], n = 14, valid n = 12

1 [1; 3], n = 46; valid n = 39

1 [1; 5], n = 73; valid n = 58

Usability of the digital workshop (median [min; max], n, valid n)

   

 IWS1

1 [1; 2], n = 7, valid n = 6

n.a

1 [1; 2], n = 7, valid n = 6

 IWS2

n.a

1 [1; 4], n = 9, valid n = 9

1 [1; 4], n = 9, valid n = 9

 IWS3

1 [1; 1], n = 4, valid n = 4

1 [1; 2], n = 6, valid n = 6

1 [1; 2], n = 10

 IWS4

n.a

2 [1; 4], n = 12, valid n = 11

2 [1; 4], n = 12, valid n = 11

 IWS5

n.a

2 [1; 2,5], n = 9, valid n = 7

2 [1; 2,5], n = 9, valid n = 7

 SWS1

1 [1; 1], n = 3, valid n = 2

1 [1; 3], n = 10, valid n = 6

1 [1; 3], n = 13, valid n = 8

 SWS2

Group assignment missing

2 [1; 5], n = 13, valid n = 7

 

 Overall

1 [1; 2], n = 14, valid n = 12

1 [1; 4], n = 46, valid n = 39

1 [1; 5], n = 73, valid n = 58

  1. Answers to the questions "Did you get a chance to speak today?" and "How did you get along with the digital format and video conference system today?" on a 6-point-rating scale (1 = “very good”, 2 = “good”, 3 = “satisfactory” 4 = “sufficient”, 5 = "poor", 6 = "deficient"), grouped by participants from the patient group (patients, patient representatives, informal caregivers) and participants from the health care professional group (health care assistants, nurses and physicians from inpatient and outpatient settings, pharmacists, medical information scientists), median with minimum and maximum rating per group and overall participants based on valid n; IWS = Intensive Workshop, SWS = Synthesis Workshop