Skip to main content

Table 2 Positive and negative experiences in patient engagement

From: The experience of patient partners in research: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis

Theme

Positive experiences

Negative experiences

1—Motivations to engage in research

Project related to patient-partners’ experiences

 

2—Activities in patient engagement

Learning and developing skills

 

Stimulating challenges

Overwhelming challenges

Feeling useful because impacts of contributions are perceived

Feeling useless because no impact is perceived

 

Not knowing if contributions have an impact

3—Structure

Clear roles and project progression

Unclear roles and project progression

Adequate engagement level

Engagement level too low

 

Engagement level too high

Flexible engagement level

 

Convenient logistics

Inconvenient logistics

4—Competence

Confidence in competence

Low confidence in competence

5—Team dynamics

Power balance achieved

Power differentials maintained

Informal atmosphere

 

Positive researcher attitudes

Negative researcher attitudes

Relationships beyond patient engagement roles

Few meaningful relationships

6—Impacts on broader life

Pride from engaging

 

Validation that patient-partners are important

 

Increased self-esteem

 
 

Distress through sensitive topics

Building a social network

 

Peer support for illness

 

Participation in a meaningful activity, development of identity

 

7—Illness

Illness-related logistical challenges considered by researchers

Illness-related logistical challenges not considered by researchers

Better health

 

Finding meaning for illness

 
  1. Positive and negative experiences on the same line represent opposite experiences of the same aspect. The relative frequency of these opposite experiences is discussed in the corresponding theme’s section