Skip to main content

Table 1 Researchers and TSO staff perspective—2017–2021

From: Co-creation of new knowledge: Good fortune or good management?

 

Co-ideation

Co-design

Co-implementation

Co-evaluation

Stakeholder involved

TSO stakeholders

Peer workers with LEX

Researchers

Funders

TSO stakeholders

Peer workers with LEX

Researchers

Funders

TSO stakeholders

Peer workers with LEX

Researchers

TSO stakeholders

Peer workers with LEX

Researchers

Tools/process

Model adapted from USA support group

Data collection procedures

Streamline communication using one email channel

Data collection flow charts

Facilitator end-of-session prompts

Process of sharing files

Risk protocols

Participant intake forms

Group survey checklist

Attendance records

Survey completion record

Opportunities

TSO stakeholders actively participated in the design and adaptation of the program

Researchers and TSO stakeholders share mutual knowledge and experience

TSO stakeholders provided feedback on using measures in practice

TSO stakeholders developed awareness of how the program could be adapted over time whilst ensuring research integrity

Consistency of service and feedback loop between TSO staff, peer workers and consumers

TSO stakeholders realised the value of the evaluation process and how results could result in benefits (increased funding) etc.

Barriers

Differences in researcher-stakeholder agendas can impede decision-making processes

Delays in receiving ethics approval due to the sensitive nature of the research

Differences in the level of understanding between researchers and stakeholders about due process in adhering to research aims and rigour

Understanding the validity of measurements

Awareness of the importance of data collection and its impact on program evaluation

Reliance on researchers to manage data, changing of program components without joint discussion

COVID pandemic

The lack of participant data prevents TSO stakeholders from demonstrating positive program outcomes

COVID pandemic

Lessons learnt

Appreciation of individual stakeholder expertise, skills and role demands and what they bring to co-creation

Consistent and open communication is required, especially regarding decisions impacting the research process

Implement administrative resources to act as an intermediary between the researcher and TSO

Stakeholders’ participation in the data collection to cement relationships between stakeholders

Participation of stakeholders in the evaluation process can help generate new innovative opportunities