Skip to main content

Table 5 Panelist evaluation of consensus process

From: Co-designing person-centred quality indicator implementation for primary care in Alberta: a consensus study

Consensus process indicator

Agree

Neither

Disagree

Consensus process is an important step for informing PC-QI implementation

100% (9/9)

0% (0/9)

0% (0/9)

The structure of the consensus process was useful for obtaining input and group discussion

100% (10/10)

0% (0/10)

0% (0/10)

As a panelist, I felt my input was valued

80% (8/10)

20% (2/10)

0% (0/10)

I felt the activities were burdensome in terms of time and energy required for participation

11% (1/9)

11% (1/9)

78% (7/9)

  1. “Agree” includes responses for “Strongly Agree” and “Agree,” “Neither” relates to the response “Neither Agree Nor Disagree,” and “Disagree” includes responses for “Disagree “or “Strongly Disagree.”