Skip to main content

Table 1 Evaluation plan, based on modified version of Kirkpatrick’s training evaluation model

From: Co-producing public involvement training with members of the public and research organisations in the East Midlands: creating, delivering and evaluating the lay assessor training programme

Focus of evaluation

Questions

Criteria

How measured

Reaction to the course

How well was the training material delivered?

Perceived quality of presentation

Level of detail provided

Pace of delivery

Amount of audience interaction/participation

Feedback form completed by trainees at end of each training session

Learning

Did the course modules fulfill the learning goals?

Level of confidence trainees had about their knowledge of topics relevant to each module

Level of confidence trainees had on how prepared they felt for lay assessing

Feedback form completed by trainees at end of each training session

Influence

Did attending the course have an impact on trainees’ confidence in their knowledge relating to lay assessing?

Change in level of confidence trainees had about their knowledge of topics relevant to lay assessing after attending the course

Comparison of pre- and post-course questionnaires completed by trainees

Were there any lasting impacts from the course on trainees?

New public involvement roles/activities adopted by trainees

Self-reports from trainees

Future development

What are trainees’ main learning and development needs following completion of the training course?

Ongoing support requested

Evaluation discussion event with working group and trainees