|
Section 1: Abstract of paper
|
|
1a: Aim
|
Report the aim of the study
| |
|
1b: Methods
|
Describe the methods used by which patients and the public were involved
| |
|
1c: Results
|
Report the impacts and outcomes of PPI in the study
| |
|
1d:Conclusions
|
Summarise the main conclusions of the study
| |
|
1e: Keywords
|
Include PPI, “patient and public involvement,” or alternative terms as keywords
| |
|
Section 2: Background to paper
|
|
2a: Definition
|
Report the definition of PPI used in the study and how it links to comparable studies
| |
|
2b: Theoretical underpinnings
|
Report the theoretical rationale and any theoretical influences relating to PPI in the study
| |
|
2c: Concepts and theory development
|
Report any conceptual or theoretical models, or influences, used in the study
| |
|
Section 3: Aims of paper
|
|
3: Aim
|
Report the aim of the study
| |
|
Section 4: Methods of paper
|
|
4a: Design
|
Provide a clear description of methods by which patients and the public were involved
| |
|
4b: People involved
|
Provide a description of patients, carers, and the public involved with the PPI activity in the study
| |
|
4c: Stages of involvement
|
Report on how PPI is used at different stages of the study
| |
|
4d: Level or nature of involvement
|
Report the level or nature of PPI used at various stages of the study
| |
|
Section 5: Capture or measurement of PPI impact
|
|
5a: Qualitative evidence of impact
|
If applicable, report the methods used to qualitatively explore the impact of PPI in the study
| |
|
5b: Quantitative evidence of impact
|
If applicable, report the methods used to quantitatively measure or assess the impact of PPI
| |
|
5c: Robustness of measure
|
If applicable, report the rigour of the method used to capture or measure the impact of PPI
| |
|
Section 6: Economic assessment
|
|
6: Economic assessment
|
If applicable, report the method used for an economic assessment of PPI
| |
|
Section 7: Study results
|
|
7a: Outcomes of PPI
|
Report the results of PPI in the study, including both positive and negative outcomes
| |
|
7b: Impacts of PPI
|
Report the positive and negative impacts that PPI has had on the research, the individuals involved (including patients and researchers), and wider impacts
| |
|
7c: Context of PPI
|
Report the influence of any contextual factors that enabled or hindered the process or impact of PPI
| |
|
7d: Process of PPI
|
Report the influence of any process factors, that enabled or hindered the impact of PPI
| |
|
7ei: Theory development
|
Report any conceptual or theoretical development in PPI that have emerged
| |
|
7eii: Theory development
|
Report evaluation of theoretical models, if any
| |
|
7f: Measurement
|
If applicable, report all aspects of instrument development and testing (eg, validity, reliability, feasibility, acceptability, responsiveness, interpretability, appropriateness, precision)
| |
|
7 g: Economic assessment
|
Report any information on the costs or benefit of PPI
| |
|
Section 8: Discussion and conclusions
|
|
8a: Outcomes
|
Comment on how PPI influenced the study overall. Describe positive and negative effects
| |
|
8b: Impacts
|
Comment on the different impacts of PPI identified in this study and how they contribute to new knowledge
| |
|
8c: Definition
|
Comment on the definition of PPI used (reported in the Background section) and whether or not you would suggest any changes
| |
|
8d: Theoretical underpinnings
|
Comment on any way your study adds to the theoretical development of PPI
| |
|
8e: Context
|
Comment on how context factors influenced PPI in the study
| |
|
8f: Process
|
Comment on how process factors influenced PPI in the study
| |
|
8 g: Measurement and capture of PPI impact
|
If applicable, comment on how well PPI impact was evaluated or measured in the study
| |
|
8 h: Economic assessment
|
If applicable, discuss any aspects of the economic cost or benefit of PPI, particularly any suggestions for future economic modelling.
| |
|
8i: Reflections/critical perspective
|
Comment critically on the study, reflecting on the things that went well and those that did not, so that others can learn from this study
| |
