Method | Positive | Negative |
---|---|---|
Q-Methodology | Will elicit a good understanding of community views of factors associated with early child health and development. | Too many statements will be challenging in a low literacy population. It will require a lot of work in a short time frame. |
Good grid structure, simple and clear to understand. | Need additional software for analysis (Uses R-Methodology). | |
“Think-out-loud” protocol is desirable. It allows for the reasoning behind factor placement to be captured. | Data analysis groups participants according to similar viewpoints not exploratory in nature. | |
Rank Order Methods | Less complex data analysis than Q-methodology. Useful for initial instrument development. | No grid. It does not allow for any topics to be given an equal weighting. |
Easy to understand. There is a simple linear structure associated with priority or preference ranking. | Not as interesting or engaging as the other two research methods for participants. We want them to want to take part in future projects. | |
Photo-Elicitation | Less text, images allow for individuals own interpretation of the aim. As the study is exploratory this may be helpful. | Less stringent research method. Will data gained still be worthwhile with a lack of numerical data. |
Images generally make difficult topics more accessible and easier to discuss. Broaching them is less probing than asking direct questions. | Timeline too short to allow participants to take their own photos (i.e. Photo-Voice). Images would need to be pre-generated. |