Peer Review reports
From: Public involvement could usefully inform ethical review, but rarely does: what are the implications?
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 Apr 2017 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 30 Apr 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jacqui Gath |
| 8 Jun 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Raksha Pandya-Wood |
| 20 Jul 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Geanina Aprodu |
| 11 Sep 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jonathan Ives |
| 31 Oct 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Kristina Staley |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 31 Oct 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Publishing | ||
| 24 Nov 2017 | Editorially accepted | |
| 11 Dec 2017 | Article published | 10.1186/s40900-017-0080-0 |
You can find further information about peer review here.