|
1
|
The group work felt collaborative
| | | | | | |
|
2
|
My contribution was valued
| | | | | | |
|
3
|
People attended who do not usually have representation (i.e. people with refugee and migrant backgrounds, people with diverse sexual orientation, people experiencing health accessibility issues)
| | | | | | |
|
4
|
The voices of refugee and/or migrant end users were heard
| | | | | | |
|
5
|
The roles and responsibilities of my participation were clearly defined
| | | | | | |
|
6
|
I understood both the processes and the language used
| | | | | | |
|
7
|
My time participating was compensated appropriately
| | | | | | |
|
8
|
There was a commitment by Shifra staff to develop consensus on what the end product should include
| | | | | | |
|
9
|
All co-designers were kept informed of any changes
| | | | | | |
|
10
|
I felt respected by Shifra staff
| | | | | | |
|
11
|
I felt respected by all co-design partners
| | | | | | |
|
12
|
Shifra staff offered me an opportunity for skill development and capability building
| | | | | | |
|
13
|
Shifra staff offered me co-design training and resources
| | | | | | |
|
14
|
There were strategies to involve people with different communication needs
| | | | | | |
|
15
|
There was enough time to allow relationship building
| | | | | | |
|
16
|
Shifra staff made attempts to reduce any power imbalance (e.g. between health professionals and refugees)
| | | | | | |
|
17
|
I felt safe sharing my opinions
| | | | | | |
|
18
|
Refugee and/or migrant end users helped shape the common agenda
| | | | | | |
|
19
|
I would participate in another co-design session with Shifra staff
| | | | | | |
|
20
|
I would encourage others to participate in a co-design session with Shifra staff
| | | | | | |
|
21
|
I see my ideas and contributions reflected in the final Shifra website/app
| | | | | | |
