Skip to main content

Table 7 Editors-in-Chief descriptions of their journal’s operations in relation to patient partnership

From: Editors-in-chief perceptions of patients as (co) authors on publications and the acceptability of ICMJE authorship criteria: a cross-sectional survey

 

N (%)

Does your journal publish non-technical (lay) summaries of research articles? (N = 111)

 Yes, always

13 (11.7)

 Yes, for some articles

14 (12.6)

 No

84 (75.7)

Does your journal involve patients in the peer review of submitted articles? (N = 110)

 Always

2 (1.8)

 Sometimes

13 (11.8)

 Never

95 (86.4)

Are patients involved in any way in the operation of your journal? (N = 109)

 Yes

7 (6.4)

 No

102 (93.6)

Does your journal specify that it adheres to the ICMJE Criteria for Authorship? (N = 111)

 Yes

75 (67.6)

 No

17 (15.3)

 Unsure

19 (17.1)

Has your journal published a paper that contained a patient or patient partner as author or co-author in the past 12 months? (N = 110)

 Yes

16 (14.5)

 No

72 (65.6)

 Unsure

22 (20.0)

Does your journal have an authorship policy which specifies how patients or patient partners should be considered as authors? (N = 110)

 Yes

4 (3.6)

 No

98 (89.1)

 Unsure

8 (7.3)