Skip to main content

Table 4 Quantitative responses to evaluation questionnaire day one N=16

From: “We are not hard to reach, but we may find it hard to trust” …. Involving and engaging ‘seldom listened to’ community voices in clinical translational health research: a social innovation approach

 

Yes

No

Sometimes

Non applicable

Non applicable

Were you happy with the communication until the event?

15/16

1/16

0/16

N/A

N/A

Was there anything else you would have liked to have known before coming to the meeting?

4/16

12/16

N/A

N/A

N/A

 

Completely

Partially

Not at all

I didn’t raise any questions

Non applicable

If yes, where your questions answered?

11/16

1/16

0/16

3/16

N/A

 

Yes

No

Sometimes

Non applicable

Non applicable

Was there enough opportunity to ask questions?

15/16

0/16

1/16

N/A

N/A

Did you feel your views were valued?

16/16

0/16

0/16

N/A

N/A

What did you think of the activities you were asked to participate in?

 

Very

A little

Not very

Not at all

Not applicable

The unseen

 It was interesting

13/16

3/16

0/16

0/16

N/A

 It was clearly explained

11/16

5/16

0/16

5/16

N/A

 I felt able to contribute

14/16

2/16

0/16

0/16

N/A

The mini patient panel one

 It was interesting

16/16

0/16

0/16

0/16

N/A

 It was clearly explained

14/16

2/16

0/16

0/16

N/A

 I felt able to contribute

16/16

0/16

0/16

0/16

N/A

The mini patient panel two

 It was interesting

14/16

2/16

0/16

0/16

N/A

 It was clearly explained

15/16

1/16

0/16

0/16

N/A

 I felt able to contribute

15/16

1/16

0/16

0/16

N/A