Skip to main content

Table 4 Quantitative responses to evaluation questionnaire day one N=16

From: “We are not hard to reach, but we may find it hard to trust” …. Involving and engaging ‘seldom listened to’ community voices in clinical translational health research: a social innovation approach

  Yes No Sometimes Non applicable Non applicable
Were you happy with the communication until the event? 15/16 1/16 0/16 N/A N/A
Was there anything else you would have liked to have known before coming to the meeting? 4/16 12/16 N/A N/A N/A
  Completely Partially Not at all I didn’t raise any questions Non applicable
If yes, where your questions answered? 11/16 1/16 0/16 3/16 N/A
  Yes No Sometimes Non applicable Non applicable
Was there enough opportunity to ask questions? 15/16 0/16 1/16 N/A N/A
Did you feel your views were valued? 16/16 0/16 0/16 N/A N/A
What did you think of the activities you were asked to participate in?
  Very A little Not very Not at all Not applicable
The unseen
 It was interesting 13/16 3/16 0/16 0/16 N/A
 It was clearly explained 11/16 5/16 0/16 5/16 N/A
 I felt able to contribute 14/16 2/16 0/16 0/16 N/A
The mini patient panel one
 It was interesting 16/16 0/16 0/16 0/16 N/A
 It was clearly explained 14/16 2/16 0/16 0/16 N/A
 I felt able to contribute 16/16 0/16 0/16 0/16 N/A
The mini patient panel two
 It was interesting 14/16 2/16 0/16 0/16 N/A
 It was clearly explained 15/16 1/16 0/16 0/16 N/A
 I felt able to contribute 15/16 1/16 0/16 0/16 N/A