Skip to main content

Table 5 Quantitative responses to evaluation questionnaire day two N=20

From: “We are not hard to reach, but we may find it hard to trust” …. Involving and engaging ‘seldom listened to’ community voices in clinical translational health research: a social innovation approach

 

Yes

No

Sometimes

Non applicable

Non applicable

Was there enough opportunity to ask questions during the meeting?

20/20

0/20

0/20

N/A

N/A

Did you feel that your views were valued?

19/20

0/20

1/20

N/A

N/A

What did you think about the activities you were asked to participate in?

The speed meeting

 

Very

A little

Not very

Not at all

Non-applicable

It was a good way of networking

16/20

2/20

1/20

0/20

N/A

It was clearly explained

17/20

2/20

1/20

0/20

N/A

I felt able to contribute

18/20

1/20

1/20

0/20

N/A

 

Very

A little

Not very

Not at all

Non-applicable

The project pitch

    

N/A

 It was fun and engaging

19/20

1/20

0/20

0/20

N/A

 It was clearly explained

17/20

2/20

0/20

1/20

N/A

 I felt able to contribute

19/20

1/20

0/20

0/20

 
 

Very

A little

Not very

Not at all

Non-applicable

Voting for projects

 It was a good way of quickly choosing winners

16/20

4/20

0/20

0/20

N/A

 It was clearly explained

16/20

4/20

0/20

0/20

N/A

 I felt able to contribute

18/20

2/20

0/20

0/20

N/A