Skip to main content

Table 5 Quantitative responses to evaluation questionnaire day two N=20

From: “We are not hard to reach, but we may find it hard to trust” …. Involving and engaging ‘seldom listened to’ community voices in clinical translational health research: a social innovation approach

  Yes No Sometimes Non applicable Non applicable
Was there enough opportunity to ask questions during the meeting? 20/20 0/20 0/20 N/A N/A
Did you feel that your views were valued? 19/20 0/20 1/20 N/A N/A
What did you think about the activities you were asked to participate in?
The speed meeting
  Very A little Not very Not at all Non-applicable
It was a good way of networking 16/20 2/20 1/20 0/20 N/A
It was clearly explained 17/20 2/20 1/20 0/20 N/A
I felt able to contribute 18/20 1/20 1/20 0/20 N/A
  Very A little Not very Not at all Non-applicable
The project pitch      N/A
 It was fun and engaging 19/20 1/20 0/20 0/20 N/A
 It was clearly explained 17/20 2/20 0/20 1/20 N/A
 I felt able to contribute 19/20 1/20 0/20 0/20  
  Very A little Not very Not at all Non-applicable
Voting for projects
 It was a good way of quickly choosing winners 16/20 4/20 0/20 0/20 N/A
 It was clearly explained 16/20 4/20 0/20 0/20 N/A
 I felt able to contribute 18/20 2/20 0/20 0/20 N/A