From: Patients as research partners in preference studies: learnings from IMI-PREFER
 | COPD | Gene therapy | Hemophilia | MM | NMDa | NSCLCa | RA | RA preventive treatmenta |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Barriers* | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
 CONFIDENCE |  |  |  |  | X |  |  |  |
 CONTENT | X |  |  |  | X |  |  |  |
 GEOGRAPHIC | X |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 IMPRECISE |  |  |  |  |  | X |  |  |
 PANDEMIC |  | X |  | X |  | X |  | X |
 PLAIN LANGUAGE |  |  |  |  | X |  |  |  |
 RECRUITPAG | X |  | X |  |  |  |  |  |
 SUPPORT |  | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
 TIME |  |  | X |  |  | X | X |  |
 UNCERTAIN |  |  |  | X | X | X |  |  |
 OTHER | (1) In one of the participating countries, the patient advocacy group had no previous experience of this kind and hence their input to the project was limited (2) The language barrier was also a complicating factor in one country (Japan) requiring an intermediary in the interaction | "…We had a big group of patient research partners but perhaps not fully representative (e.g. only 1 male and no PRP from one of the participating countries)" |  |  |  |  |  |  |