Table 3 Characteristics of included studies
Author Year | Summary aims | No. lived experience contributors | Lived experience type | Type of guidance | JBI Critical Appraisal Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Visser 2021 [34] | “To encourage others to harness the benefits of co-producing research with people with lived experience of health care in prison” | 3 | Lived experience of cancer care in prison | Reflections and guidance | 85% (Medium) |
Abrahams 2015 [36] | “To explore the ethical and practical dilemmas which arise when including service user advisors within a research team.” | 3 | Homelessness | Reflections | 75% (Low) |
Penrod 2016 [35] | “To illustrate key methodological strategies in the application of PAR methods in a study designed to promote sustainable insider-generated system-level changes in the provision of end-of-life (EOL) care in the restrictive setting of state prisons” | 18 | Providing palliative and end of life care in prison settings (staff) | Reflections | 70% (Low) |