Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: “They should’ve talked to us more”: lay health advisors’ experiences with community-engaged hypertension research

Original Submission
17 Apr 2023 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Apr 2023 Author responded Author comments - Cyleste C. Collins
13 May 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
21 May 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Darcell P. Scharff
8 Aug 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
9 Sep 2023 Author responded Author comments - Cyleste C. Collins
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Apr 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Sep 2023 Author responded Author comments - Cyleste C. Collins
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Sep 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Dec 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
18 Dec 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
27 Dec 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
18 Jan 2024 Author responded Author comments - Cyleste C. Collins
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Jan 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
18 Jan 2024 Editorially accepted
25 Jan 2024 Article published 10.1186/s40900-024-00544-8

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page