Table 3 Preferred highest level of involvement in systematic review steps at baseline (N = 20)
Keep me up to date n (%)* | Invite to participate n (%)* | Invite me to participate* | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Researchers/graduate student (n = 12) | Clinician-researchers (n = 5) | Patients/consumers (n = 3) | |||
1. Screen titles and abstracts of citations | 6 (30) | 13 (65) | 9 (75) | 3 (60) | 1 (33) |
2. Reconcile conflicts from title/abstract screen | 6 (30) | 14 (70) | 10 (83) | 3 (60) | 1 (33) |
3. Screen full text of citations | 6 (30) | 13 (65) | 9 (75) | 4 (80) | 0 (0) |
4. Reconcile conflicts from full text screen | 6 (30) | 14 (70) | 10 (83) | 4 (80) | 0 (0) |
5. Review interventions to verify they meet minimal definition of a patient decision aid | 5 (25) | 12 (60) | 6 (50) | 4 (80) | 2 (66) |
6. Search grey literature sources | 13 (65) | 3 (15) | 2 (17) | 1 (20) | 0 (0) |
7. Extract data into data collection forms | 9 (45) | 7 (35) | 5 (42) | 2 (40) | 0 (0) |
8. Assess risk of bias of included studies | 8 (40) | 9 (45) | 7 (58) | 2 (40) | 0 (0) |
9. Assist with interpretation of the results of the analysis | 1 (5) | 18 (90) | 11 (92) | 5 (100) | 2 (66) |
10. Assess GRADE evidence ratings | 10 (50) | 8 (40) | 6 (50) | 2 (40) | 0 (0) |
11. Discuss the network meta-analysis | 3 (15) | 16 (80) | 10 (83) | 3 (60) | 3 (100) |
12. Provide feedback on the draft systematic review article | 0 (0) | 20 (100) | 12 (100) | 5 (100) | 3 (100) |