Skip to main content

Table 7 PPEET results: Barriers to patient engagement (PE)

From: Lessons learned in measuring patient engagement in a Canada-wide childhood disability network

Theme

n = number of utterances

Subtheme

n = number of utterances

% of Theme

Sub-subtheme

n = number of utterances

% of Sub-subtheme

Description

PAG

utterances

n (%)

RES

utterances

n (%)

COMM

utterances

n (%)

Total utterances

n (%)

Barriers to PE

N = 54

Ambiguity in goals

N = 1

(1.9)

 

Refers to ambiguous goals and how to potentially overcome

0

0

1

1

   

Total

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (100.0)

1 (100.0)

 

Availabilities of PP

N = 2

(3.7)

 

Refers to being more transparent from the beginning for planning the expected time and type of engagement

0

2

0

2

   

Total

0 (0.0)

2 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

2 (100.0)

 

Compensation issues

N = 1

(1.9)

 

Refers to an administrative issue that came up when reimbursing a PAG

0

1

0

1

   

Total

0 (0.0)

1 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (100.0)

 

Complexity of protocols and research steps

N = 2

(3.7)

 

Refers to lack of transparency surrounding the type of knowledge needed to be a PAG (expectations)

0

1

1

2

   

Total

0 (0.0)

1 (50.0)

1 (50.0)

2 (100.0)

 

Concurrent commitments impending engagement

N = 2

(3.7)

 

Refers to not being able to reach all voices perhaps due to too many commitments

0

2

0

2

   

Total

0 (0.0)

2 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

2 (100.0)

 

Deciding what perspectives from PP are to be incorporated and how

N = 4

(7.4)

 

Refers to the challenges of knowing what to incorporate and touches upon methods taken to alleviate (ex: discussions, outlines and documenting everything)

0

3

1

4

   

Total

0 (0.0)

3 (75.0)

1 (25.0)

4 (100.0)

 

Difficulty understanding the science involved and the research process

N = 1

(1.9)

 

Refers to challenges with understanding concretely goals and timelines, behind the science discussions

1

0

0

1

   

Total

1 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (100.0)

 

Engagement as challenge

N = 2

(3.7)

 

Refers to challenges engaging everyone at the same time

0

0

2

2

   

Total

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

2 (100.0)

2 (100.0)

 

Group homogeneity

N = 8

(14.8)

 

Refers to similar voices being heard, all participants mostly being parents, lack of minority voices

0

5

3

8

   

Total

0 (0.0)

5 (62.5)

3 (37.5)

8 (100.0)

 

Keep up with engagement over long periods of time

N = 2

(3.7)

 

Refers to engagement dropping off as the study progresses and scheduling difficulties

0

2

0

2

   

Total

0 (0.0)

2 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

2 (100.0)

 

Lack of clarity re roles

N = 5

(9.3)

 

Refers to PAG’s not knowing what their research is being useful for, or just not understanding their role/context

1

0

4

5

   

Total

1 (20.0)

0 (0.0)

4 (80.0)

5 (100.0)

 

Lack of F2F meetings

N = 1

(1.9)

 

Refers to not meeting in person

1

0

0

1

   

Total

1 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (100.0)

 

Lack of meetings or PP presence in meetings

N = 3

(5.6)

 

Refers to not seeing PP during some meetings, but also brings up lack of meetings in general, so no opportunity to see PP

0

0

3

3

   

Total

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

3 (100.0)

3 (100.0)

 

Lack of PI engagement

N = 1

(1.9)

 

Refers to not seeing engagement from the core research group during meetings

1

0

0

1

   

Total

1 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (100.0)

 

Linguistic, social and cultural differences

N = 1

(1.9)

 

Refers to the reasons why some PPs may not participate in the meetings to their full extent

0

1

0

1

   

Total

0 (0.0)

1 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (100.0)

 

Managing PP expectations vs. feasibility in incorporating feedback

N = 2

(3.7)

 

Refers to the challenges of incorporating feedback and also setting limits re how much can efficiently be incorporated

0

2

0

2

   

Total

0 (0.0)

2 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

2 (100.0)

 

Newsletters hard to navigate

N = 1

(1.9)

 

Refers to challenges with newsletters

1

0

0

1

   

Total

1 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (100.0)

 

Pandemic related issues

N = 1

(1.9)

 

Refers to being more sensitive with regard to reaching out the PPs during pandemic vs how you would reach out in the past

0

1

0

1

   

Total

0 (0.0)

1 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (100.0)

 

PE is time consuming

N = 1

(1.9)

 

Refers to the length of time it takes to increase PP engagement

0

1

0

1

   

Total

0 (0.0)

1 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (100.0)

 

PIs too focused on individual research projects

N = 1

(1.9)

 

Refers to lack of engagement from PI/research team and how it can negatively affect PE/effective PE

0

0

1

1

   

Total

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (100.0)

1 (100.0)

 

Planning ahead for resources needed to do engagement

N = 1

(1.9)

 

Refers to the expectation that PE can be done immediately, but really needs investing time and energy to do well

0

1

0

1

   

Total

0 (0.0)

1 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (100.0)

 

Possibly overwhelming PP with tasks

N = 1

(1.9)

 

Refers to how PAGs participation is currently solicited and how to change that for the future

0

1

0

1

   

Total

0 (0.0)

1 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (100.0)

 

Project related technical difficulties

N = 1

(1.9)

 

Refers to gaps in communication with PAGs when things go wrong or get delayed with research

0

1

0

1

   

Total

0 (0.0)

1 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (100.0)

 

Scheduling and organizing meetings that suit everyone’s availabilities

N = 4

(7.4)

 

Refers to the overall difficulties that have arisen with scheduling and solutions like rotation lunch times or offering multiple locations/times

0

4

0

4

   

Total

0 (0.0)

4 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

4 (100.0)

 

Struggle to establish formal relationships with PP

N = 1

(1.9)

 

Refers to relationships with PP and RES mostly informal, less engagement when reaching out formally

0

1

0

1

   

Total

0 (0.0)

1 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (100.0)

 

Time zones and different locations

N = 2

(3.7)

 

Refers to logistical challenges when meetings include PAGs from across Canada

1

1

0

2

   

Total

1 (50.0)

1 (50.0)

0 (0.0)

2 (100.0)

 

Transition in project phases and its impacts on engagement

N = 2

(3.7)

 

Refers to potential measures to take as a way of better planning for changes in engagement levels throughout the project

0

2

0

2

    

0 (0.0)

2 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

2 (100.0)

   

Grand total

6 (11.1)

32 (59.3)

16 (29.6)

54 (100.0)

  1. PAG Patient-advisory group, RES researchers, COMM committee members, PP patient-partners