Skip to main content

Table 1 Thematic structure

From: Co-producing an online patient public community research hub: a qualitative study exploring the perspectives of national institute for health research (NIHR) research champions in England

Theme

Subthemes

Examples

Content

Research literacy

Researchers and universities can seem intimidating

Empowerment

Wider lack of awareness amongst public of how to get involved in research

Interaction

Move away from traditional methods of dissemination

Communicating about PPIE

Frustration about “not hearing back” if you have helped out

Information about studies

Dislike of term “lay summaries”

Dissemination of findings

Frustration with not seeing how research has changed practice for patients

Usability

Too academic

Corporate

Less is more

Visuals

Elitist

Hard work, cognitively demanding to work through webpages (information overload)

Want to connect and talk to researchers

Can feel overwhelming with too much information

Navigation was tricky for some with some confusion over what things were in each section and occasionally inadvertently veering off the hub to other pages

Unclear at times as to who sections were intentionally for

Signposting

Links via trusted organisations, other groups

Visibility on noticeboards, social media

Tailor messages/information to specific groups

Suspicion over websites, sites text message that are not associated with familiar organisations e.g., NHS

Traditional methods e.g., community noticeboards are still acceptable for sharing information

Some organisations/ groups e.g., Patient Panel Groups within General Practices may not know that they could help to signpost, and how

Connectedness

Equality, Diversity, Inclusion

Disconnect

Connections to researchers and universities

Active partnership with HEI

Sense of belonging

Not being heard

Not feeling connected

Feeling that macro level organisations are not connected to individuals

Research may be viewed as an “academic exercise” not based on real need